Processing math: 100%

Sunday, April 15, 2012

Cohomology of Finite Fields Part III

I gave a proof (with help from math.stackoverflow) in my last blog for the 0th cohomology of the field extension {\mathbb{F}_4/\mathbb{F}_2}. While I have sketches for descriptions of {H^0(\mathbb{F}_{p^m} / \mathbb{F}_p)} for any prime {p} and positive integer {m}, I've not yet been able to describe {H^1} for even the simplest cases. I shall describe the problem in this post.

First, recall that I mention in my first post on NCG cohomologies of field extensions that a first order differential calculus gives rise to a differential graded algebra. Let's briefly describe this:

Given our [possibly noncommutative] algebra {A = \Omega^0}, we've already described it's first order differential calculus as an {A}-bimodule {\Omega^1} together with a linear map {d: \Omega^0 \rightarrow \Omega^1} that obeys the rules 1) {d(ab) = a \cdot db + da \cdot b} (where {\cdot} is the action of the algebra on the bimodule) and 2) {\Omega^1 = \{a \cdot db : a, b \in \Omega^0\}}. The differential graded algebra is then defined as graded algebra {\Omega = \bigoplus_n \Omega^n} together with the map {d : \Omega^n \rightarrow \Omega^{n+1}} and the rules: {\Omega^0 = A}, {\Omega^1} as before, {d^2 = 0}, and {\Omega} generated by {\Omega^0} and {\Omega^1}. The product of the differential graded algebra is the wedge product {\wedge}, as in classical differential geometry.

Putting the above together, we get a complex {A = \Omega^0 \xrightarrow{d^0} \Omega^1 \xrightarrow{d^1} \ldots}. Here {d^n} is the restriction {d^n = d |_{\Omega^n}}. The cohomology is then defined as {H^n(A) = \text{ker}(d^n)/\text{Im}(d^{n-1})}, with {H^0(A) = \text{ker}(d^0)} as we saw in the last two posts.

In our case of the field extension {\mathbb{F}_4/\mathbb{F}_2}, we have as our algebra the polynomial ring {A = \mathbb{F}_2[x]}. We've already defined a differential calculus on it, the polynomial ring {\Omega^1 = \mathbb{F}_4[x]}, where {\mathbb{F}_4 = \mathbb{F}_2(\mu)}, together with the differential map {df = \frac{f(x + \mu) - f(x)}{\mu}}. Using this, how can we describe the differential graded algebra {\Omega = \bigoplus_n \Omega^n} ?

First, recall that {\mathbb{F}_4} is a two dimensional vector space over {\mathbb{F}_2} with basis {\{1, \mu\}}. This means that the polynomial ring {\Omega^1} can be ``spanned'' by {\{1, \mu\}} over the polynomial ring {\mathbb{F}_2[x]}. In other words, every {f \in \Omega^1} can be written as {f = f_1 \cdot 1 + f_\mu \cdot \mu}, with {f_1, f_\mu \in \Omega^0}. In order for us to get a graded algebra, {\Omega^2} must have a basis {\{1 \wedge \mu\}}, hence it's a one dimensional space over {\Omega^0} and thus is isomorphic to {\Omega^0}. {\Omega^n = 0} for {n > 2}, as we're using a classical anticommutative wedge product.

But what is the map {d^1: \Omega^1 \rightarrow \Omega^2} ? Well, from our description of {\Omega^1}, we can easily express the action of {d} on {\Omega^1} as an action on {\Omega^0}, which is well defined. Id est, for {f \in \Omega^1},

\displaystyle d^1 f = d^0(f_1) \wedge 1 + f_1 \wedge d^0(1) + d^0(f_\mu) \wedge \mu + f_\mu \wedge d^0(\mu)


Now, {d^0(a) = 0} for any constant polynomial, and {d^0(g) \in \Omega^1} for any {g \in \mathbb{F}_2}. So {d^0g = \partial_1 g \cdot 1 + \partial_\mu g \cdot \mu}. Hence we have linear maps {\partial_1, \partial_\mu : \mathbb{F}_2[x] \rightarrow \mathbb{F}_2[x]}. We return to {d^1} using this idea:

\displaystyle d^1 f = (\partial_1 f_1 \cdot 1 + \partial_\mu f_1 \cdot \mu) \wedge 1 + (\partial_1 f_\mu \cdot 1+ \partial_\mu f_\mu \cdot \mu) \wedge \mu

The wedge product is anticommutative, so this leaves us with:

\displaystyle d^1 f = (\partial_1 f_\mu - \partial_\mu f_1) \cdot 1 \wedge \mu


And {d^2 f = 0}, as the rest of the {\Omega^n}'s are 0. Now back to the cohomologies: {H^1(\mathbb{F}_4/\mathbb{F}_2) = \text{ker}(d^1)/\text{Im}(d^0)}, where {\text{ker}(d^1) = \{f \in \Omega^1 : \partial_1 f_\mu = \partial_\mu f_1 \}} and {\text{Im}(d^0) = \{f_1 \cdot 1 + f_\mu \cdot \mu \in \Omega^1 : \exists f \in \mathbb{F}_2[x] \; \text{such that} \; df = f_1 \cdot 1 + f_\mu \cdot \mu\}}. Hence the we need to find a description of the ``partial derivatives'' {\partial_1} and {\partial_\mu}. In other words, we need to describe {d^0f} as:

\displaystyle \frac{f(x + \mu) -f(x)}{\mu} = \partial_1 f + \partial_\mu f \cdot \mu

By noting that {\mu^3 = 1}, I was able to write down a formula for {\partial_i x^{3n}}, and then formulas for {\partial_i x^{3n+1}} and {\partial_i x^{3n+2}} in terms of {\partial_i x^{3n}}. But the binomial expansion makes these formulas just too messy to work with. I then tried finding a basis under which the maps would have a nice, neat formula, but I had no luck there. Next I tried looking at the action of the Galois group on d.


Now, the only non-trivial element of the \text{Gal}(\mathbb{F}_4/\mathbb{F}_2) is the Frobenius automorphism \sigma(x) = x^2, exempli gratia, \sigma\mu=\mu^2=\mu+1. The action of the Galois group extends to an action on the polynomial ring - one that leaves \mathbb{F}_2 fixed. Hence we have

\displaystyle \sigma d f = \sigma(\partial_1 f) + \sigma(\partial_\mu f \cdot \mu) = \partial_1 f + \partial_\mu f \cdot (\mu + 1) = df + \partial_\mu f

This allows us to write the ``partial derivatives'' in terms of d and the Frobenius automorphism. Id est,

\displaystyle \partial_\mu f = \sigma (d f) - d f

and

\displaystyle \partial_1 f = df - \sigma(d f) \mu + (df) \mu

It remains to be seen if these formulas for the partials will actually help me calculate the remaining cohomologies.

No comments:

Post a Comment